viva FOSSFA, viva!

In thoughtful consideration of several reactions to Nnenna’s (@Nnenna) posting concerning the (locally) publicised M$FT hotshot Jean-P. meeting yet another African President (yawn – Jean-P. is an avid collector of ‘me-and-da-president’ kodak moments).

I have weathered many futile interactions with near-fabled “men (and occasional women) from the ministry”.  As has been said of education, “If you want to move a graveyard, don’t expect much help from the occupants!”  

Very few of you will recall a BBC radio-series of that description from the early *nineteen-seventies*; a series about lazy, bungling, incompetent civil servants, with “Number One” and “Number Two” making decisions in the General Assistance Department of *the* Ministry, watched over by a lecherous, pompous, self-seeking Permanent Under-Secretary.  Instead of assistance, this department created mix-ups, misunderstandings and general screw-ups.  

The Brits have certainly been good at holding up to ridicule the vices, follies, abuses and shortcomings of government officials.  Since the first cartoon published by *Punch* in 1843, they’ve continued to produce several excellent satires intent on shaming arrogantly authoritarian systems into improvement –  the Goon show, Monty Python and Mr Bean all spring to mind.  While Punch, sadly, is no more, we *are* left with an excellent legacy of constructive social criticism, using *wit* as a weapon.  

To wit ;-);  who, indeed, is the ritual clown in this latest ‘phallophorian’ M$FT publicity stunt?  Is it our old friend Jean-Phillipe Courtois, or some ‘man from *the* ministry’?  Pray tell, what is his name?  

Ministries of Education, of Youth, Finance, ICT, even Works and Transportation.  More recently, Ministry of Fish and Energy.  My personal list is long,  but the stereotype is a *constant*; middle-aged, middle-management suits – mostly over-weight decision-makers who are on “exceptionally good terms” with, more often than not, local and (mostly) international ICT businessmen (rarely women – think Sahara Holdings in South Africa – President Zuma’s son Duduzane is a director of subsidiary Sahara Computers – remember Gauteng Online?).  And so it is in most countries, including Namibia and Kenya and … the country list is long.

These ministerial decision-makers control which company provides what ICTs, influence the exemption from (otherwise probably) transparent tender processes, persist in using non-standards to describe their ministries’ ICT requirements (e.g., intel-inside, M$FT-compatible, Office applications, etc.) and who, by the very nature of their *bewitching* technical skills (they are even *seen* to be using smart phones these days), have the complete, *awed* and undivided attention of their political leadership.  Pertinently, “love me *tender*, love me sweet, never let me go….Ill be yours through all the years, till the end of time” 🙂 

The concept of a wicked vizier (or sadrazam) comes to mind whenever I see these bloated fruit-flies hover around the ears of our political leadership.  

One only has to listen to the speeches prepared for our political leadership by these *tenured* ICT experts to understand the extent of their influence (and expertise:-)).  Take, for example, the prepared speech *read* by our Prime Minister Hage Geingob at the opening of eLA 2013 in Windhoek recently.  The only reference made to any purportedly *successful* ICT4E outcome in Namibia was that of M$FT’s *Pathfinder* project which *failed* in 2005.  Was it *coincidental* that Mark East, GM for M$FT’s education industry group for Africa, Middle East and Asia, spoke at us the very next morning with some more lies about the success of Pathfinder and (the future of) M$FT in Africa’s education sector?  I can only say thank G*d that Donald Clark ( was on hand to sober any heady expectations the audience may have had of M$FT’s expensive patronage!  

It was an uncomfortable déjà vu experience, listening to Mark East talk about Pathfinder at eLA 2013.  I remembered that I had – in 2005 – reacted quite strongly to the manner in which M$FT *baled* out of their infamous Pathfinder project (see  That, after several “off-the-record” good-cop-bad-cop meetings with him and his cronies Jean-P., (dear) George Ferreira, Lizzie Range, Sean Nicholson, Reza Bardien and several local government suits during that tempestuous time.  Diverse attempts to swing my vote of confidence. for M$FT.  

We used to have a “bounty wall” in our Katutura SchoolNet workshop – a place where we posted the mugshots of diverse culprits of ICT4E failure in Namibia – here’s one we did for Jean-P.  in 2005…

The october 2008 Wall Street Journal article by Steve Stecklow –  M$FT battles Low-cost rival for Africa (, covers many of the issues which our Kenyan friends are dealing with (again).  It’s well worth reading this article (again), since it is clear that the very same forces are still at play in Africa.  

Africa has weathered many naïve, ‘bleedin’ heart, drop ‘n run’ international ICT4E&D misanthropies, and one more does not burden the reality that such misguided ‘trick or treat’ generosity does more harm than good in otherwise generally well-defined frameworks of ICT development in education in Africa.  I’ve said this before, and I’ll continue to say it again.   

The Microsoft ‘Pathfinder’ project, Negroponte’s OLPC (now tablet) project, Shell’s ‘Oshana Connect’ project , the Italian CISP telecentre project, World Computer Exchange and their ilk, US Peace Corps and Rotary Club’s school PC donation drives, to name but a *few*, have all failed dismally, given their lack of attention to long-term support obligations with *realistic* cost of ownership.  Conventional international ICT development support has traditionally focused on quick project returns based on well-padded capital expenses, numbers of computers (proudly!) delivered, and sleek, shining ‘best practices’ reports filled with ‘kodak moments’ of happy children enjoying whatever prescribed flavour of computing device has been put out to play. 

Tut tut, tick-tock, tock. What options do we have to counter such weaknesses?  

Find, name and shame your particular man from the ministry. Use whatever local media at your disposal.  He’s the one who, ignorant of your wit, dreads your criticism. S/He will likely accuse you of character assassination. 

We should probably start an Ushahidi crowdmap of failed ICT4E&D projects and wicked viziers in Africa.  

And finally – we also have time and the evolution of assistive technologies, based overwhelmingly on FLOSS.  Viva FOSSFA, viva!

Yours, Joris@Namibia

> Change is a primary constant…. be assured things will always change,
> the
> question is can we influence them to change in the way that is best for
> us………….


Read my blog

Posted in #eLA13, #eLA2013, @stevesong, Crowdmapping, EduNet Namibia, FOSS, FOSSFA, Ict4e, Pathfinder, schoolnet, tatejoris, Ushahidi
One comment on “viva FOSSFA, viva!
  1. tatejoris says:

    I am smitten by the notion that several mail servers saw my mail dealing with this blog roll as spam; this has never happened to me :-)! My handle 'tatejoris' and email address are more than likely “mud” in the eyes of several governments and their M$FT supporters. While I won't immediately read conspiracy into my sudden spam status, judging from the extent to which PRISM and other nasty invasions of privacy are rocking our world, I
    wouldn't put it past M$FT to block my mail wherever possible :-).

    Yes. I understand that the satirical TV series 'Yes Minister' was an 'nineteen-eighties' BBC TV follow-on of the original radio series 'men from the ministry'. I also understand that I must be at least 20 years older than you are :-).

    Crowdmapping ICT4E failures and successes for posterity, government viziers and tycoons (perhaps even the sale of BMW and Benz SUVs?), does
    appeal to me; I'm presently crowdmapping neighbourhood crime, so why not international ICT4E projects and their “supporters” as well :-)?
    Could be cool graphic material for an IDRC-like publication sensu Steve Song's @stevesong connectivity maps for Africa.

    The fact that the organisers and editor of the eLA 2013 Report managed to use a sprinkling of my responses (to a *solicited* set of interview
    questions about FOSS and FOSSFA, mind you), in large bold blue font throughout the report, yet neglected to acknowledge me as the *interviewee* (I'm variously referred to as a “Namibian practitioner or interview respondent or interviewee” in the document) proves that I'm still an anathema to the 'viziers' in Namibia – and further afield.

    Geraldine and I *are* acknowledged for “inputs” in the acknowledgement section while all the other solicited interviewees are mentioned by name.

    The eLA report can be downloaded at

    The editor of the report managed to include the acronym FOSSFA in the list of acronyms. Nowhere else in the Report is FOSSFA mentioned. FOSS
    is mentioned twice outside the list of acronyms – both in a quotation (mine) ascribed to a Namibian practitioner. I had the premonition in
    March that my interview would not be treated in the same manner as that of Neil Butcher and the others… I took the liberty of posting the *original* interview for the eLA 2013 report to my blog. For those of you interested –

    Was I pissed off by this turn of events? Sure, but I got over it. And I didn't have to pay for my (often quite vocal) participation at eLA2013 – thanks to Rebecca Strohmeyer who I finally got to meet. We did agree that there will always be bigger fish to fry!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: